A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between future neighbours above the development of the wall at a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated countrywide notice following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members property at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier along with the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around design works at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, seek to make their spouse and children home. The case has become emblematic of broader disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, where enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of recognized citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall staying made by their prospective neighbours goes outside of the boundaries permitted beneath preparing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, the two people of Dublin Street, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases in their arranging authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal ecosystem including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly built, is in the correct place. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to protect their watch, an allegation which has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal planning disputes, exactly where views of The ocean are both of those highly prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained extraordinary initiatives because of the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waist-higher h2o all through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, an image which includes considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of the wall’s situation relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website from the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by way of storm h2o to photograph the positioning turned Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely observed that such actions ended up cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall prolonged into a region afflicted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been protected intimately via the national press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as readers sought to know the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely keep the wall, as made, goes past what was approved and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations attached to your permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have each pressured that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to organizing law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting rather that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing relationship to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a couple basically attempting to create a spouse and children property in accordance with the legislation. They deny the wall encroaches with a Unique Place of Conservation and say that all is effective have already been performed based on Specialist advice and accredited designs. Their lawyers have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which include moving into The ocean all through a storm, will not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal web page happens to be a shorthand description for just a situation that many observers see as increasingly prevalent. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning private land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has started to become a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier pointed out the businessman had Earlier been associated with nearby advocacy on arranging and environmental troubles, although not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances and René Collier waded by midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both of those the physical reality in the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see Rene Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times as an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The court should establish if the wall as created complies with arranging permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Particular Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and arranging problems. But the human component remains central: neighbours who will have to Stay alongside one another very long following the legal expenditures are already paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over development operates at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, however the implications of the situation extend further than that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how immediately a local disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns which include environmental protection and residence legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of pure beauty and contested boundaries. The wall with the centre of your dispute stands partially constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. Regardless of whether it will eventually ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.