A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between prospective neighbours in excess of the construction of the wall in a coastal web page inside of a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which has captivated nationwide interest subsequent an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed household household at Sutton Strand, in which allegations of arranging breaches, environmental considerations, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in the courts. The Irish Moments short article about René Collier as well as the Irish Instances article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a highly publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above development is effective at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and an organization director respectively, seek out to build their spouse and children home. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, wherever enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections and also the sensitivities of proven residents. In accordance with the Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall currently being built by their possible neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally people of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their organizing authorization by developing a wall outside of the boundaries of their web-site, resulting in an encroachment over a Particular Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, therefore places are subject to rigorous controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even small encroachments could have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in the delicate coastal natural environment which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their planning authorization, and say the wall, which can be partly developed, is in the correct placement. Their legal group has characterised the action as an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of in search of to halt homebuilding as a way to maintain their look at, an allegation which has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of numerous coastal arranging disputes, in which views of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives via the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In line with sworn evidence referenced while in the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-significant drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, an image which has considering that grow to be emblematic in the depth of the dispute. These steps were not basically symbolic; they were being intended to Get visual proof from the wall’s placement relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site in the sea Irish Situations noted, describing how the two Adult males entered the h2o during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm h2o to photograph the location turned Among the most hanging descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Times post about accountant Paul Feely famous that this sort of actions were cited to display the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a location affected by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was currently being encroached on.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were covered in detail from the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 became commonly searched phrases as viewers sought to grasp the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court read even further submissions on regardless of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical instant within the lawful timeline.
With the Main with the dispute is usually a disagreement over boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain that the wall, as manufactured, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, is called meticulous in his examination of setting up files, maps, and problems attached for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their action is determined by issue for environmental security and adherence to organizing legislation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public check out, insisting rather that it is about guaranteeing that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have explained their prolonged-standing Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 relationship to the region as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple simply wanting to produce a household household in accordance with the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Space of Conservation and say that every one is effective are actually completed determined by Skilled guidance and authorized ideas. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like moving into The ocean throughout a storm, do not alter the fundamental information.
The case has also raised broader questions on how arranging disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute above development of wall at coastal internet site has become a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats has become far more contentious.
The Irish Occasions article about René Collier observed that the businessman had previously been associated with regional advocacy on preparing and environmental difficulties, even though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from pretty diverse Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, have become synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Times protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-significant water during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Times and René Collier waded by midsection-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting both the physical reality from the coastline as well as the symbolic mother nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an too much strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings proceed, the end result remains uncertain. The courtroom have to ascertain whether the wall as developed complies with arranging authorization and whether any encroachment into a Particular Spot of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing ailments. But the human element stays central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside each other long following the lawful fees have been paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around building performs at the site on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation increase past that deal with. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. It also underscores how quickly an area disagreement can escalate when essential issues like environmental security and assets legal rights are perceived to generally be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of normal attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly created, a physical manifestation of unresolved lawful issues. Irrespective of whether it will eventually eventually be altered, eradicated, or finished as prepared will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will very likely proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more closely watched setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.